Page 80 - journal-8-23-Full
P. 80

Ò˘   «“√ “√°“√·æ∑¬ ¬·º√ “  ·≈–°“√ ∑ ¬∑åå∑“߇≈◊Õ°                          ªï∑’Ë ¯©∫—∫∑’Ë Ú-Û æƒ…¿“§¡-∏—π«“§¡ ÚııÛ
                  √°“√ ∑ å π‰∑¬
                                                ‡
             «“√ “√°“√·æ∑¬å·ºπ‰∑¬·≈–°“√·æ∑¬
               √ “√°“√ ∑¬å·ºπ‰∑¬·≈–°“√ ∑¬å∑ ‡å·ºπ‰∑¬·≈–°“√·æ∑¬å∑“߇≈◊Õ°

                  Abstract
                       A Comparison of Outcomes of Treatment with Thai Traditional Massage and Ultrasound in
                       Patients with Cervical Myofascial Pain Syndrome
                       Kitiya Kowithayanon*, Panada Thaechasubamorn**
                       *Physical Therapy Department, Bhudachinaraj Hospital, Phitsanulok, **Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty
                       of Allied Health Sciences, Naresuan University

                           Rationale: Patients with cervical pain caused by myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) are commonly found
                       in clinics. Thai traditional massage and ultrasound have been used as treatment methods for MPS. However,
                       little is known about the effects of those methods.
                           Objective: To compare outcomes of treatment between Thai traditional massage and ultrasound in pa-
                       tients with cervical pain from MPS.
                           Method: From 2005 to 2007, 44 patients with cervical pain from MPS participated in this study. The
                       subjects were randomly divided into two groups and treated in three sessions a week for four weeks.  The first
                       group was treated with ultrasound and the second group with Thai massage. Cervical range of motion (CROM),
                       pain levels using visual analog scale (VAS), functional rating index (FRI) before and after treatments, and
                       patients’ satisfaction after treatments were measured.  Comparative analyses of data before and after the
                       treatment used were subjected to paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Between groups were analyzed
                       by independent t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test, with the level of significance being 0.05.
                           Result: CROM values were increased significantly after the Thai massage and ultrasound treatments (p
                       = 0.001). VAS and FRI decreased significantly after both treatments (p=0.001).  There was no difference on
                       CROM and VAS in comparison between the two treatments.  FRI in the Thai massage group was better than
                       in the ultrasound group (p = 0.044). In addition, patients’ satisfaction was significantly greater in the Thai
                       massage group (p = 0.014).
                           Summary: Both Thai massage and ultrasound can significantly increase CROM and decrease pain scores
                       and pain during daily living activities in patients with cervical MPS. Thai massage enhances their ability to
                       perform daily activities and produces greater patient satisfaction when compared with ultrasound. Therefore,
                       we encourage the use of Thai massage in patients with cervical pain caused by MPS.
                       Key words:  Thai massage, traditional massage, ultrasound, cervical myofascial pain syndrome
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85