Page 100 - วารสารกรมการแพทย์แผนไทยฯ ปีที่ 17 ฉบับที่ 2
P. 100

238 วารสารการแพทย์แผนไทยและการแพทย์ ทางเลือก     ปีที่ 17  ฉบับที่ 2  พฤษภาคม-สิงหาคม 2562




                 atibai tamra phra o-sot phra narai [Explanation of King   cal range of motion in asymptomatic healthy persons.
                 Narai’s Medical Treatise]. Bangkok: Amarin; 2001. p.   Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2016;32:457-61.
                 72. (in Thai)                             24.  Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom
               14.  Thongmarong P, Phoomyai P. Determination of Capsa-  BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain
                 icin and Antioxidant Activity in Spicy Herbs. Proceed-  outcome measures. Pain. 2000;88:287-94.
                 ings of The 4th National Conference KPRU; 22 Dec 2017;     25.  Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A. The clinical importance
                 Kamphaeng Phet: Kamphaeng Phet Rajabhat University;   of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic
                 2017. p. 931-6. (in Thai)                   low back pain. European Spine Journal. 2003;12:12-20.
               15.  National List of Essential Medicines 2018. Thailand     26.  Abbott JH. Mobilization with movement applied to the
                 (2018), Published in Royal Thai Government Gazette,   elbow affects shoulder range of motion is subject with
                 Vol. 135, Part 14G. (10 Jan 2018). (in Thai)  lateral epicondylagia. Manual Therapy. 2001;6:170-7.
               16.  Borm GF, Fransen J, Lemmens WA. A simple sample     27.  Price DD, Finniss DG, Benedetti F. A comprehensive re-
                 size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized   view of the placebo effect: recent advances and current
                 clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007;60:   thought. Annual Review of Psychology. 2008;59:565-90.
                 1234-8.                                   28.  Richards P, Stasko VG, Stasko I, Lacko M, Hewson G.
               17.  Scott J, Huskisson EC. Vertical and horizontal vi-  ALGRX 4975 reduces pain of acute lateral epicondylitis:
                 sual analog scales. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases.   Preliminary results from a randomized, double-blind,
                 1979;38:560.                                placebo-controlled, phase II multicenter clinical trial.
               18.  Wilkie D, Lovejoy N, Dodd M, Tesler M. Cancer pain   The Journal of Pain. 2006;7:s3.
                 intensity measurement: Concurrent validity of three     29.  Cantillon M, Vause E, Sykes D, Moon A, Hughes S.
                 tools—finger dynamometer, pain intensity number scale,   Safety, tolerability and efficacy of ALGRX 4975 in Osteo-
                 visual analogue scale. The Hospice Journal. 1990;6:1-13.   arthritis (OA) of the knee. The Journal of Pain. 2005;6:s39.
               19.  Fisher AA. Pressure threshold meter: its use for quanti-    30.  Simpson DM, Brown S, Tobias JK, Vanhove GF. NGX-
                 fication of tender spots. Archives of Physical Medicine   4010, a capsaicin 8% dermal patch, for the treatment of
                 and Rehabilitation. 1986;67:836-8.          painful HIV-associated distal sensory polyneuropathy:
               20.  Fisher AA. Documentation of myofascial trigger points.   results of a 52-week open-label study. 2014; 30: 134-42.
                 Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.     31.  Naosaran K, Nutakul W. Quantity and composition of
                 1988;69:286-91.                             spicy chili. Buletin of the Department of Medical Sci-
               21.  Reeves JL, Jaeger B, Graff-Redford SB. Reliability of the   ences. 1992;34:133-40. (in Thai)
                 pressure algometer as a measure of myofascial trigger     32.  Wolfson AB, Hendey GW, Ling LJ, Rosen CL, Schaider
                 point sensitivity. Pain. 1986;24:313-21.    J, Sharieff GQ. Harwood-Nuss’ Clinical Practice of
               22.  Tousignant M, de Bellefeuille L, O’Donoughue S, Graho-  Emergency Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott
                 vac S. Criterion validity of the cervical range of motion   Williams & Wilkins, a Wolters Kluwer Business; 2010. 71
                 (CROM) goniometer for cervical flexion and extension.   p.
                 Spine. 2000;25:324-30.                    33.  Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory.
               23.  Farooq MN, Bandpei MAM, Ali M, Khan GA. Reliability   Science. 1965;150:971-9.
                 of the universal goniometer for assessing active cervi-
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105