Page 78 - วารสารกรมการแพทย์แผนไทยฯ ปีที่ 5 ฉบับที่ 2
P. 78

Ò˜ˆ  «“√ “√°“√·æ∑¬å·ºπ‰∑¬·≈–°“√·æ∑¬å∑“߇≈◊Õ°                              ªï∑’Ë ı©∫—∫∑’Ë Ú æƒ…¿“§¡ -  ‘ßÀ“§¡ Úıı



               Table 1 Population of healers by provincial distribution, calculated sample of healers (number of healers visited), and number
                     of healers selected for in-depth study

                                         Total Phu Tai     Number of healers visited  Number of healers selected for
               Province                         1                         2                           3
                                           healers            and interviewed              in-depth study
               Kalasin                       98                     56                          3
               Sakon Nakhon                 112                     64                          5
               Nakhon Phanom                 95                     53                          3
               Mukdahan                     156                     90                          9
               Total                        461                    263                         20
               1
                 Names and addresses of these healers were recorded in the databases of the Provincial Health Office.
               2
                 Calculated sample size.
               3
                 Purposive sample size based on healer survey and profile interviews using inclusion criteria in Table 2.


               Table 2 Number of Phu Tai traditional healers (persons) by provincial location and type of healer

               Type if healer                         Kalasin  Sakon Nakhon   Nakhon Phanom  Mukdahan   Total

               1. Herbalist (À¡Õ¬“ ¡ÿπ‰æ√)              23          31            26             38     118
               2. çSandingé healer (À¡Õ¬“Ωπ)             5           6             6             10       27
               3. çBlowingé healer (À¡Õ‡ªÉ“)             7           8             5              5       25
               4. çYaoé healer (À¡Õ‡À¬“)                 4           5             3              8       20
               5. Moh Dhamma (À¡Õ∏√√¡)                   3           3             4              7       17
               6. Moh Nam-montra (À¡ÕπÈ”¡πµå)            7           4             3              8       22
               7. Moh Su-khuan (À¡Õ Ÿà¢«—≠)              5           3             4              6       18
               8. Midwife (À¡Õµ”·¬)                      2           4             2              8       16
               Total                                    56          64            53            90      263





             and socio-demographic interviews with the healers,  tion is given in Table 1.
             the treatment methods, and health condition logs were   Among the 263 Phu Tai healers randomly se-
             used to analyze the socio-demographic charateristics  lected for profile and socio-demographic interview and
             of the healers. One-way ANOVA was used to mea-     participatory observation, eight types of healers were
             sure variance and significant among different fators  specified by the healers themselves, by patients or
             by using Statgraphics and STATA solfware.          villagers, and, in some cases, by our research team.
                                                                The types of healer are classified mainly by their meth-
                                 Result                         ods of treatment.  Data on these eight types of healer

                                                                are shown in Table 2.
             1. Population and sample of healers

                 From databases of the Thailandûs Provincial    2. Inclusion criteria and healers selected for in-
             Health Offices in Kalasin, Sakon Nakhon, Nakhon    depth study
             Phanom, and Mukdahan provinces, 461 healers were        After taking a profile survey of 263 Phu Tai heal-
             listed (as of May 2005).  The sample size of the heal-  ers, inclusion criteria were developed to select the
             ers included in this research was calculated to be  healers for the in-depth study.  The criteria and method
             263.  The population of healers by provincial distribu-  of verification are shown in Table 3.  Based on the
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83