Page 120 - วารสารการแพทย์แผนไทย ปีที่ 21 ฉบับที่ 2
P. 120

336 วารสารการแพทย์แผนไทยและการแพทย์ ทางเลือก      ปีที่ 21  ฉบับที่ 2  พฤษภาคม-สิงหาคม 2566




                The cytotoxicity of CTL, PSP and Y5R   between  IC 10 and IC 20 values.  CTL demon-
           were evaluated using MTT assay. The non-    strated inhibition in a dose dependant manner

           linear regression was generated between log   whereas, PSP and Y5R showed lower inhibitory
           concentration and % viability. PSP gave the   activity (roughly 15-20% at the concentration
           inhibitory concentration (IC) at 50% (IC 50) 20%   of 25 and 50 µg/mL).  CTL also inhibited TM-

           (IC 20) and 10% (IC 10) of 42695.72, 346.96 and   PRSS2 enzyme in a dose dependent manner
           6.50 µg/mL, respectively. Y5R gave the IC 50,   (p < 0.5). The % relative inhibition was 53.82,
           IC 20 and IC 10 of 14068.70, 453.74 and 49.56 µg/  63.90 and 71.15 % at the doses of 1,000, 1,500

           mL, respectively. Whereas, CLT gave the lower   and 2,000 µg/mL, respectively.  ACE2 and
           cytotoxicity at the IC 50, IC 20 and IC 10 of 4597.27,   TMPRSS2 enzymatic inhibition at different
           1995.50 and 1377.86 µg/mL, respectively.    concentrations of PSP, Y5R and CTL were

                ACE2 enzymatic inhibition of the extracts   shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4.
           was evaluated at approximate concentrations




























           Figure 3  ACE2 enzymatic inhibitory activity at the   Figure 4  TMPRSS2 enzymatic inhibitory activity at the
                   highest concentrations which were not      highest concentrations which were not toxic
                   toxic to calu-3 cells of MLN4760 standard   to calu-3 cells of camostat standard inhibi-
                   inhibitor, PSP, Y5R and CTL.  Data is ex-  tor, PSP, Y5R and CTL.  Data is expressed
                   pressed as mean ± SD, n = 3. Statistical   as mean ± SD, n = 3. Statistical analysis
                   analysis was carried out using One-Way     was carried out using One-Way analysis of
                   analysis of variance (non-parametric test)   variance followed by Kruskal-Wallis multiple
                   followed by Kruskal-Wallis multiple com-   comparisons (*p < 0.5).
                   parisons (**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125