Page 56 - วารสารกรมการแพทย์แผนไทยฯ ปีที่ 5 ฉบับที่ 3
P. 56

ÚˆÙ   «“√ “√°“√·æ∑¬å·ºπ‰∑¬·≈–°“√·æ∑¬å∑“߇≈◊Õ°                               ªï∑’Ë ı©∫—∫∑’Ë Û°—𬓬π - ∏—π«“§¡ Úıı



                 The drawback of the present study was that,    in a larger group of influenza patients may be helpful
             even though 15 health service centers and 1 hospital  for building stronger evidence to support such thera-
             joined in the study and the data were collected over  peutic use.
             an 18-month period, only 25 patients could be re-
                                                                              Acknowledgements
             cruited into the study.  There were three main rea-
             sons that explained why the number of patients par-     The authors would like to express their gratitude
             ticipated in this study was rather low.  First, during  to Dr. Paijit Warachit, Director-General of the Depart-
             the study period, cases of avian influenza were re-  ment of Medical Sciences; Dr. Pathom Sawanpanyalert,
             ported in several provinces of Thailand, including  Director of the National Institute of Health, Department
             Nonthaburi province.  Therefore, when patients sus-  of Medical Sciences; and Pol. Capt. Dr. Rungrueng
             pected of having influenza visited the study sites and  Kijphati for kindly providing us with 400 Quick Vue
             the test of their nasal secretions showed a positive  influenza test kits for the study.  We are also thankful to
             result for influenza, there was the possibility that the  the Chaophaya Abhaibhubejhr Hospital Foundation for
             patients might have avian influenza.  Therefore, the  providing us with Andrographis paniculata capsules at
             health officials were reluctant to recruit such patients  a special price and the staff of the Herbal Quality As-
             into the study for fear that, if they really had avian  surance Center, Department of Medical Sciences for
             influenza, they would not receive proper treatment  their assistance on the quality analysis of the herbal
             and it would be harmful to their health and well-  medicine.  We are also thankful to Mrs. Pranee
             being.  Therefore, we could not recruit patients into  Chavalittumrong, Director of the Medicinal Plant Re-
             the study for a considerable period of time.  Second,  search Institute, Department of Medical Sciences, for
             before visiting the study sites, a number of influenza  her suggestions and help on the statistical analysis of
             patients had already taken some over-the-counter cold  the data, and to Miss Kritiya Yamnium for her help in
             medications, and thus could not be included in the  the research project.  We would also likes to express
             study.  Thirdly, some health service centers had no  our thanks to the officers and staff of the Bang Kruai
             case of influenza at all and as many as 80 suspected  Hospital and the 15 health service centers under the
             case were tested negative for influenza.  This was  Nonthaburi Provincial Public Health Office who con-
             probably because Nonthaburi province previously did  tributed to the study: the health service centers of Bang
             not have many reported cases of influenza.  There-  Srimuang, Wat Sai Ma, Tasai, Talard Quan, Tansamrit,
             fore, if there is going to be a further study in the  Tumbon Bang Kruai, Tumbon Sao Thong Hin, Wihan
             future,  other provinces with history of high numer of  Pracha, Tumbon Bang Lane, Wat Rajniyom, Klaung Pra
             reported cases, such as southern provinces, Kanchan-  Udom, Bang Pood, Wat Lad Pladook, Moo 3 Bang Kurat,
                               3,4
             aburi, or Chantaburi  should be selected as study  and Bangrak Yai.
             sites instead.
                 In conclusion, the present study shows an addi-  References
             tional beneficial effect of Andrographis paniculata (6.4  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cold versus Flu. [cited
             g/day) when it is given with paracetamol (4 g/day): it  2007 Oct 27]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/qa/
                                                                    coldflu.htm
             reduces the severity of overall symptoms of influenza,
                                                                  2. American Lung Association. Guidelines for the prevention and treatment
             cough, and fatigue better than paracetamol alone and
                                                                    of influenza and the common cold.  [cited 2007 Oct 27]. Available
             helps influenza patients to recover from various res-  from: http://www.lungusa.org/site/pp.asp?c=dvLUK9O0E&b=23161.
             piratory and constitutional symptoms sooner than they  3. Phatinawin L. Influenza: 2006 Annual report. [cited 2007 Nov 3].
                                                                    Available from: http:/203.157.15.4/Annual/Annual49/Part1/
             otherwise would.  This finding supports the recom-
                                                                    29_Influenza.doc.
             mended use of this herbal medicine in influenza in
                                                                  4. Weekly Epidemiological Surveillance Report. [cited 2007 Nov 3].
             primary health care and for its inclusion on the Na-
                                                                    Available from: http://203.157.15.4/wesr/file/F47534.pdf, http://
             tional List of Essential Drugs.  However, further study  203.157.15.4/wesr/file/F48524.pdf, http://203.157.15.4/wesr/file/
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61