Page 139 - วารสารปีที่16ฉบับที่2

311

4. WHO. Operational guidelines for ethics committees that International Organizations of Medical Sciences
review biomedical research. Geneva: the WHO (CIOMS); 2016. p. viii-ix
Document 9. World Medical Association. World Medical Association
5. WHO. Surveying and evaluating ethical review Declaration of Helsinki ethical principles for medical
practices: a complementary guideline to the operational research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310:
guidelines for ethics committees that review biomedical 20:2191-4.
research. Geneva: the WHO Document Production 10. Mahaisawariya P. Revision the CIOMS guidelines.
Services; 2000. 22 p. (WHO document TDR/PRD/ FERCIT Newsletter 2559;16(1):1-5. (in Thai)
ETHICS/2000.1) 11. Morakot N. change of law and criteria on ethics review
6. WHO/TDR. Operational guidelines for the establishment of health-related research with human participants in
and functioning of data and safety monitoring boards. 2017. FERCIT Newsletter 2559;17(2):1-7. (in Thai)
Geneva: the WHO Document Production Services; 2005. 12. Chokevivat V. A critiqueof the draft Research in Human
36 p. Act, B.E....: Drug System Monitoring are Development
7. WHO. Standards and operational guidance for ethics Center (DHD), et al. Nonthaburi: Mata Printing Co.,
review of health-related research with human Ltd.; 2017.
participants. Geneva: the WHO Document Production 13. Constitution of Thailand B.E. 2560 (2017). Thailand B.E.
Services; 2011. 41 p. 2560 (2017): Government Gazette, Vol. 134, Part 40 kor.
8. CIOMS. International ethical guidelines for health-related (6 April 2017). (in Thai)
research involving humans. Geneva: Council for