Page 142 - Acrobat J Trad-21-3-2566
P. 142

J Thai Trad Alt Med                                    Vol. 21  No. 3  Sep-Dec  2023  625




            as following: 0-5 min, 5%A : 95%B; 5-20 min,   8. Statistical analysis
            5%A : 95%B – 20%A : 80%B; 20-30 min, 20%A :      The experiments were conducted in trip-

            80%B – 70%A : 30%B; 30-35 min, 70%A : 30%B;   licate and the results were reported as mean  ±
            35-40 min 5%A : 95%B. The flow rate was set at   standard deviation (SD). The IC 50 values were
            1.0 mL/min, and the analysis was conducted at   calculated by using a regression analysis. The

            room temperature. Mitragynine was detected   differences between groups were statistically
            at a wavelength of 245 nm. Standard solutions   analyzed using one-way ANOVA with post hoc
            were prepared with concentrations ranging   analysis. GraphPad Prism software (CA, USA)

            from 10 to 250 µg/mL. To ensure the quality   was utilized for statistical analysis.
            of the analysis, quality control (QC) samples
            were prepared by spiking standard solution                  Results

            into sample solution at concentrations 15, 75      The extraction yields of the Kratom ex-
            and 150 µg/mL. The extracts were prepared by   tracts are shown in Table 1. The 70% ethanol

            diluting with methanol and filtered through a   extract (KE70) exhibited the highest extraction
            0.45 µm membrane filter prior to injection into   yield, whereas the 95% ethanol extract (KE95)
            the HPLC system.                            demonstrated the lowest.



            Table 1  Extraction yield of Kratom leaves extracts

             Extraction solvent        Extraction method       Code          Extraction Yield (%)

             95% Ethanol                 maceration            KE95               18.8
             70% Ethanol                 maceration            KE70               36.2
             50% Ethanol                 maceration            KE50               34.5
             Water                        decoction            KDec               31.5




            1. In vitro inhibitory effect on alpha-     in Figure 1. All extracts at a concentration of

               glucosidase and alpha-amylase            1,000 µg/mL demonstrated activity of less

                 The anti-diabetes activity of the Kra-  than 50%, indicating that they were ineffec-
            tom extracts were evaluated using alpha-    tive in inhibiting the alpha-amylase enzyme.

            glucosidase and alpha-amylase enzymes.      However, for alpha-glucosidase, KE70 and the
            Prior to determining IC 50, the % inhibition of   50%etahnolic extract (KE50) exhibited inhibi-
            the Kratom extracts was screened, as shown   tory activity greater than 50%, and were thus
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147