Page 117 - วารสารปีที่15ฉบับที่3

383

3. Thai Herbal Pharmacopoeia. Vol. II. Bangkok: 13(1):23-36.
Prachachon Co., Ltd. 2000. p. 9-18. 8. To-a-nun C, Sommart T, Rakvidhyasastra V. Effect of
4. ‡©≈‘¡æ≈ ÿ«√√≥¿—°¥’. °“√»÷°…“Õπÿ°√¡«‘∏“π¢Õßæ◊™ °ÿ≈æ√‘° some medicinal plants and spices on growth of
‰∑¬ (Piper L.) „πª√–‡∑»‰∑¬ (Taxonomic studies of the Aspergillus. Abstract of the 11th Conference of Science
genus Piper L. (Piperaceae) in Thailand) ∫—≥±‘μ«‘∑¬“≈—¬ and Technology Thailand, Kasetsart University,
¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬‡°…μ√»“ μ√å ª√‘≠≠“«‘∑¬“»“ μ√å¡À“∫—≥±‘μ Bangkok, Thailand. October 24-26, 1985:364-5.
(惰…»“ μ√å). æ.». 2548. 174 Àπâ“. 9. Morikawa T, Matsuda H, Yamaguchi I, Pongpiriyadacha
5. «ÿ≤‘ «ÿ≤‘∏√√¡‡«™. “√“πÿ°√¡ ¡ÿπ‰æ√. °√ÿ߇∑æ¡À“π§√: ‚Õ.‡Õ Y, Yoshikawa. New amides and gastroprotective
æ√‘Èπμ‘Èß ‡Œ“ å; 2540. Àπâ“ 193. constituents from the fruit of Piper chaba. Planta Med.
6. Mokkhasmit M, Ngarmwathana W, Sawadimongkol K, 2004;70:152-9.
Permpiphat U, Pharmacological evaluation of Thai 10. Chaveerach R, Kunitake H, Nuchadomrong, Sattayasai
medicinal plants. J Med Assoc Thai. 1971;54:490-503. N, Komatsu H. RAPD patterns as a useful tool to
7. Õ“√’√—μπå ≈ÕÕªí°…“, ÿ√—μπ“ Õ”π«¬º≈, «‘‡™’¬√ ®ß∫ÿ≠ª√–‡ √‘∞. differentiate Thai Piper from morphologically alike
°“√»÷°…“ ¡ÿπ‰æ√∑’Ë¡’ƒ∑∏‘Ïμâ“π·∫§∑’‡√’¬∑’Ë∑”„À⇰‘¥°“√μ‘¥‡™◊ÈÕ Japanese Piper. Science Asia. 2002;28:221-5.
¢Õß√–∫∫∑“߇¥‘πÀ“¬„® (μÕπ∑’Ë 1). ‰∑¬‡¿ —™ “√. 2531;