Page 62 - journal_13-3_Full

246

§√—Èß∑’Ë 4. °√ÿ߇∑æœ: ¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬∏√√¡»“ μ√å; 2557. Àπâ“ 1976. p. 29-30.
25-57. 29. ‰æ√—™ ‡μ™–√‘π∑√å. π‚¬∫“¬·≈–°≈«‘∏’°“√¡’ à«π√à«¡¢Õß
23. Wilson W. (1887). The Study of Administration. New York: ™ÿ¡™π„π¬ÿ∑∏»“ μ√å°“√æ—≤π“. »Ÿπ¬å°“√»÷°…“π‚¬∫“¬
New York: Walker & Company; 1887; p. 19. “∏“√≥ ÿ¢ ¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬¡À‘¥≈. °√ÿ߇∑æœ: »—°¥‘Ï‚ ¿“
24. Ott J. Classic Readings in Organizational Behavior. °“√æ‘¡æå; 2525. Àπâ“ 24-30.
California: Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1975. p. 17. 30. Õ§‘π √æ’æ—≤πå. §Ÿà¡◊Õπ—°æ—≤π“. °√ÿ߇∑æœ: »—°¥‘Ï‚ ¿≥
25. Frederickson H. New public administration. New York: °“√æ‘¡æå; 2527. Àπâ“ 3-4.
New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company; 1977. p.25. 31. ®√—≥∏√ ∫ÿ≠≠“πÿ¿“æ. °“√μ‘¥μ“¡°“√‡ª≈’ˬπ·ª≈ß
26. Stivers C. çActive Citizenship and Public Administrationé √–∫∫𑇫»°“√‡°…μ√„π√–¬–¬“«·≈–°“√ª√–‡¡‘πº≈
Refounding Public Administration. London: W.W.Norton °√–∑∫¢Õß·ºàπ¥‘π∂≈à¡ μàÕ√–∫∫𑇫»°“√‡°…μ√ „π
& Company; 1980. p. 27. æ◊Èπ∑’ËÕ”‡¿Õ≈—∫·≈ ®—ßÀ«—¥Õÿμ√¥‘μ∂å. °√ÿ߇∑æœ: Õ—°…√
27. ‘√‘¿“æ√√≥ ≈’È¿—¬‡®√‘≠. (2555). °“√®—¥°“√ (WMS Journal ¬“¡°“√æ‘¡æå; 2553. Àπâ“ 25-53
of Management). æ‘¡æå§√—Èß∑’Ë 2. ߢ≈“: ¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬ 32. §≥–°√√¡°“√æ—≤π“¿Ÿ¡‘ªí≠≠“∑âÕß∂‘Ëπ¥â“π ÿ¢¿“æ·Ààß
ߢ≈“π§√‘π∑√å; 2555. Àπâ“ 27. ™“μ‘.·ºπ¬ÿ∑∏»“ μ√å°“√æ—≤π“¿Ÿ¡‘ªí≠≠“‰∑ ÿ¢¿“æ«‘∂’‰∑
28. William E. Participation Management: Concept Theory and ©∫—∫∑’Ë 2 (æ.».2555-2559). °√ÿ߇∑æœ: Õÿ…“°“√æ‘¡æå; 2555.
Implementation. California: The Rand Corporation Company; Àπâ“ 1-15.

Abstract
The Formation of Integrated Policy on the Protection of Thai Traditional Medicine
Knowledge
,†,§
Nunthasak Chotichanadechawong* , Nopraenue Sajjarax Dhirathiti ‡
*Director, Bureau of Protection of Thai Traditional Medicine Knowledge, Department for
Development of Thai Traditional and Complementary Medicine, Ministry of Public Health,
Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
† Doctor of Public Administration Program in Public Policy and Public Management, Faculty of Social
Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
‡ Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Phutthamonthon,
Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand.
§ Corresponding author: krittatach.dtam@gmail.com

This study aimed to review the problems, situation, environment, inputs, process and out-
comes that led to the formulation of present-day’s integrated policy, using David Easton’s System
Theory. It involved data collection from questionnaires and analysis of relevant data/informa-
tion, documents, reports, laws and regulations.
The results showed that: (1) the situation and environment in forming the integrated policy
were in line with the government policy, while importance was accorded to all agencies’ main
functions and regarding the integration direction as just the process or sub-activities. Regarding
the inputs and mechanisms for process transformation, attention was paid to the movement at
the national level or under the government’s policy framework. And the strength was the fact
that relevant agencies were all in agreement about the policy integration under the First and
Second National Strategic Plans for Thai Wisdom and Thai Healthy Lifestyle Development in
simultaneously moving forward at the national level. (2) Regarding the roles and participation of
stakeholders as well as civic network members, they all fully agreed on the formation of inte-
grated policy - the mean agreement score of 4.42 (on a 1-5 scale), indicting a positive effect on the
actual implementation of such a policy for development purposes.
Key words: formulation of integrated policy, policy process, protection of Thai traditional medi-
cine wisdom, role and participation of stakeholder